While running the test I had no other app open on the device other than the native Safari browser. I ran Sunspider on my iPhone 5 three times and each time I ended up around the 915 to 920 ms mark. But again, it's a number people want to hear, so hear it it. How fast iMore or the New York Times or Facebook loads on your phone is much better indicator. Some browsers include hacks designed just to do better on Sunspider. Like Geekbench, Sunspider can be a mixed bag. After running each test 5 times, Sunspider gives an average number of time (in milliseconds). It includes real-world situations like encryption and text manipulation and measures response time in milliseconds for each test. Sunspider measures Javascript performance in the web browser. Samsung Galaxy S III (North America) - 1429.If you're wondering how the iPhone 5 stacks up against other devices that have been benchmarked using Geekbench, here are some reference numbers for popular Android devices. The A5X processor obviously performs significantly better than the iPhone 4S' standard A5 but when it comes to the A6, the iPhone 5 wins each and every time. Our average result on Geekbench for the iPad 3 was around 750 after 5 consecutive tests. That puts the iPhone 4S far lower on the Geekbench scale than the iPhone 5. iPhone 4SĪfter 5 consecutive tests, the average was around 635. The average of 5 consecutive tests was 1615. The iPhone 5 scored between 15 each time we ran the rest. Geekbench looks at all kinds of information across the entire system, including integer, floating point, memory, and stream performance.Higher numbers are better. However, it's the tool we have and the number everyone always asks for, so we're running it. How fast Infinity Blade 2 launches, or the App Store loads up its interface, or the camera takes to shoot a picture is a better indicator of day-to-day performance. Now Geekbench isn't a great comparison tool - writing something that tests CocoaTouch apps on iOS, JVM apps on Google, and other platforms in a consistent way is nearly impossible. To put all this into perspective, we performed a hard reboot on each device, killed all running apps, and then ran tests using Geekbench 2 for iOS. It's a dual-core ARMv7 processor reportedly clocked around 1.25GHz along with a triple-core SGX 543MP3 and 1GHz of RAM. The iPad 3 ups the game with an A5X SoC with the same CPU clocked at 1GHz, a quad-core PowerVR SGX543MP4 graphics chip, and 1GB of RAM.įor the iPhone 5, instead of licensing the next-generation ARM design, the A15, Apple custom-built their own Apple A6 SoC based on the ARM instruction set. The iPhone 4S uses an Apple A5 system-on-a-chip (SoC), which combines a dual-core ARM Cortex A9 processor clocked at 800MHz with a dual-core PowerVR SGX543MP2 graphics chip and 512MB of RAM. They are averages from each respective benchmarking site or verified data from on of our cross-platform sites - Android Central, wpcentral, or Crackberry. The Android, Windows Phone, and Blackberry 10 results were not performed by us. At the time either the benchmarking app was the only thing running or Safari in order to obtain the benchmarks. All devices were also running the iOS 6 public release candidate.Īs a preface, the only thing I did before performing any of these benchmarks was close out all apps from the multitasking tray. It seems a little more practical than comparing it straight out of the box. So for this test I restored an iCloud backup to my iPhone 5 that's already on my iPad 3 and iPhone 4S so they're both loaded with tons of the same data. Odds are the first thing you'll do is load up your iPhone 5 with the usual suspects - apps, games, contacts, calendars, reminders, music, video, etc. Pulling a device out of the box and running benchmarks is fine, but it doesn't necessarily give real world results.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |